:
Pontes 2000
National Literatures At The End Of The Century

Hundreds of cultures clashing, co-operating, warring and uniting, disappearing or growing; small cultures closing on themselves, large cultures whose parts break off and melt with other continents; this is what Europe has been like for centuries.

Cultures are reduced to distinguishing characteristics in warring sides, reduced to banners for political, monetary and military power.

But at the heart of any culture lies the testimony and the glorification of the individual. Cultural development, by its very nature, works for a liberal society able to protect the individual-the bearer of culture. Europe has thus repeatedly tried, with more or less adroitness and good will, to build supranational social structures that would separate the mechanisms of power from the streams of cultures, so as to turn cultural differences into a veritable wealth of possibilities. It seems that the nineties have given an additional spur to the latest project of the kind. The European Union has already passed the long way of uniting European cultures in a space free of monetary and military conflict.

This is where we come to the questions we hope to discuss at Pontes 2000:

Is it possible to turn Europe into a unified space of unlimited flow for national cultures, free of destructive conflict, where competitiveness is not articulated through negating the other?

Or will, perhaps, the freedom of financial flow and the boundlessness of new information technology help the new form of consumers' mentality to overpower culture?

Will this impoverished scale of values create a new Europe, whose decadent fall awaits the generations to come?

Where is literature in all that? What does it communicate? Individuals, cultures, or scales of value? Does it strengthen or weaken the unity of European space? How much of literature today is created within individual national cultures, and how much on a European level? Is there such a thing as European literature?

Can the Internet promote linguistic wealth?

Will the literatures of small European peoples end up like the literatures of small peoples of Commonwealth, translated into English, leaving their native languages behind and approaching the market on its own terms?

Can national literatures disappear at all? The way that literatures in the so-called "dead languages" have disappeared? Can the dictation of the majority market be as devastating for national literatures as national linguistic standards had been for dialectal literature?

… Those are only some of the questions we ask ourselves looking at Pontes 2000. You are invited to participate on these pages in further discussion topics to be on this summer's agenda in Krk.